--- title: Tool Search sidebar_position: 95 --- # Tool Search When you have many MCP servers or non-core plugin tools attached to a session, their JSON schemas can consume a substantial fraction of the context window on every turn — even when only a few of them are relevant to what the user actually asked for. **Tool Search** is Hermes' opt-in progressive-disclosure layer for that problem. When activated, MCP and plugin tools are replaced in the model-visible tools array by three bridge tools, and the model loads each specific tool's schema on demand. :::info Built-in Hermes tools never defer The tools that make up Hermes' core capability set (`terminal`, `read_file`, `write_file`, `patch`, `search_files`, `todo`, `memory`, `browser_*`, `web_search`, `web_extract`, `clarify`, `execute_code`, `delegate_task`, `session_search`, and the rest of `_HERMES_CORE_TOOLS`) are *always* loaded directly. Only MCP tools and non-core plugin tools are eligible for deferral. ::: ## How it works When Tool Search activates for a turn, the model sees three new tools in place of the deferred ones: ``` tool_search(queries, limit?) — search the deferred-tool catalog (one or more queries) tool_describe(names) — load the full schemas for one or more tools tool_call(name, arguments) — invoke a deferred tool ``` A typical interaction looks like: ``` Model: tool_search(["create a github issue", "send a slack message"]) → { results: [ { query: "create a github issue", matches: ["mcp_github_create_issue", ...] }, { query: "send a slack message", matches: ["mcp_slack_post_message", ...] } ], tools: { mcp_github_create_issue: { description: "...", required: ["title"], ... }, mcp_slack_post_message: { ... } } } Model: tool_describe(["mcp_github_create_issue", "mcp_slack_post_message"]) → { tools: { mcp_github_create_issue: { parameters: { ... } }, mcp_slack_post_message: { parameters: { ... } } } } Model: tool_call("mcp_github_create_issue", { title: "...", body: "..." }) → { ok: true, issue_number: 42 } ``` Each query in a `tool_search` call is searched independently against the same catalog (`limit` applies per query); the per-query groups carry tool names only, while the shared `tools` map holds each matched tool's description and required parameter names once. Queries are stemmed, so "issues" finds `create_issue`. Each query group that returns no matches includes an `available_sources` summary of the connected servers so a lexical miss is not mistaken for a missing capability. `tool_describe` resolves every requested name in one call; unknown names are reported in `not_found` without failing the rest of the batch. When the model invokes `tool_call`, Hermes **unwraps the bridge** and dispatches the underlying tool exactly as if the model had called it directly. Pre-tool-call hooks, guardrails, approval prompts, and post-tool-call hooks all run against the real tool name — not against `tool_call`. The activity feed in the CLI and gateway also unwraps so you see the underlying tool, not the bridge. ## When does it activate? Tool Search uses **tiered disclosure**: the presence of *any* deferrable (MCP/plugin) tool activates the bridge; what scales with catalog size is how much of the catalog stays visible, not whether schemas defer. | Tier | Condition | What the model sees | | --- | --- | --- | | **0** | No MCP/plugin tools | Every tool eager, no bridge. Pass-through. | | **1** | Deferred catalog's listing fits the budget | Bridge + a skills-style manifest of every deferred tool (name + short description, degrading to names-only when over budget). Degradation is **per server**: when one oversized server (Cloudflare) is attached alongside small ones (Linear), the small servers keep their per-tool listings and only the oversized server collapses to a summary line. | | **2** | Per-tool listing exceeds the budget even names-only for every server (e.g. Cloudflare's flat API surface alone: ~3,300 tools whose names are ~32K tokens) | Bare bridge + a one-line-per-server summary (server name + tool count), so the model knows which domains are reachable; individual tools are discoverable only through `tool_search`. | The listing budget is `min(threshold_pct% of context, listing_max_tokens)`. The decision is re-evaluated every time the tools array is built, so adding or removing MCP servers mid-session moves the session between tiers on the next assembly. ## Configuration ```yaml tools: tool_search: enabled: auto # auto (default), on, or off threshold_pct: 5 # listing budget as a percentage of context search_default_limit: 5 max_search_limit: 25 listing: auto # embed a grouped name+description catalog manifest listing_max_tokens: 4000 ``` | Key | Default | Meaning | | --- | --- | --- | | `enabled` | `auto` | `auto`/`on` activate whenever at least one deferrable tool exists; `off` disables entirely (everything stays eager). `auto` is currently an alias of `on` — it is reserved for a future mode that inlines schemas when they fit the context and defers only when they don't. Pin `on` or `off` if you want today's behavior guaranteed across upgrades. | | `threshold_pct` | `5` | Listing budget as a percentage of the active model's context length. Range 0–100. | | `search_default_limit` | `5` | Hits returned per query when the model calls `tool_search` without a `limit`. | | `max_search_limit` | `25` | Hard upper bound the model can request via `limit` (per query). Range 1–50. | | `listing` | `auto` | Embed a skills-style manifest of every deferred tool (name + first sentence of its description, ≤60 chars, grouped by MCP server) in the `tool_search` bridge description. `auto` includes it when it fits the budget (falling back to names-only, then to the tier-2 server summary); `on`/`off` force either way. | | `listing_max_tokens` | `4000` | Absolute cap on the embedded listing, regardless of context size. Range 200–60000. Large catalogs degrade to names-only or per-server summaries, keeping full schemas available through search. | Per-call array caps are internal safety bounds, not configuration. Over-cap calls return an error so the model can retry with a smaller batch. ### Why the listing exists Without it, deferred capabilities are *invisible* — live benchmarking showed models substituting visible core tools (running `gh` in the terminal instead of searching for the deferred GitHub tool) or declaring a capability nonexistent instead of calling `tool_search`. The listing applies the skills pattern to tools: every capability stays discoverable by name at all times, while full parameter schemas remain deferred. If the model sees the exact tool name in the listing, it can skip `tool_search` and go straight to `tool_describe`, saving a round trip. You can also flip the legacy boolean shape: ```yaml tools: tool_search: true # equivalent to {enabled: auto} ``` ## When NOT to use it Tool Search trades a fixed per-turn token cost (the three bridge tool schemas plus the catalog listing) and at least one extra round trip on cold tools (describe → call) for the savings on the deferred schemas. At tier 1 the listing keeps every capability visible, so the discovery round trip usually disappears — the model goes straight to `tool_describe`. Live benchmarking showed the listing mode matching eager loading's task success while costing less than the bare bridge. If you want the old always-eager behavior for a small toolset, set `enabled: off`. ## Trade-offs that don't go away These come from the prompt-cache integrity invariant — they are inherent to any progressive-disclosure design, not specific to this implementation: - **One extra round trip on cold tools.** The first time the model needs a deferred tool, it spends one or two extra model calls to find and load the schema. The token savings on the static side are real, but a portion is paid back at runtime. - **No cache benefit on deferred schemas.** A loaded `tool_describe` result enters the conversation history (so it does get cached on subsequent turns) but it never benefits from the system-prompt cache prefix. - **No provider-native validation for deferred schemas.** `tool_describe` lets the model read a deferred tool's schema, but the provider still sees only the generic `tool_call.arguments` object. Hermes therefore coerces and validates the underlying arguments locally before dispatch; the concrete tool or MCP server remains responsible for schemas Hermes cannot safely validate, such as malformed schemas or external references. - **Model-quality dependence.** Tool Search assumes the model can write a reasonable search query for the tool it wants. Smaller models do this less well; the published Anthropic numbers (49% → 74% on Opus 4 with vs. without tool search) show the upside but also that ~26 points of accuracy is still retrieval failure. - **Toolset edits invalidate cache.** Adding or removing a tool mid- session changes the bridge tools' descriptions (which include the count of deferred tools) and the catalog, so the prompt cache is invalidated. This is the same trade-off as any toolset edit. ## Implementation details - **Retrieval:** BM25 over tokenized tool name, source name (the MCP server or plugin toolset the tool belongs to, so searching `"linear"` finds that server's tools even when a tool's own name doesn't carry the service), description, and parameter names, with Snowball stemming (English) applied to both the index and the query so morphological variants match ("issues" finds `create_issue`). Falls back to a literal substring match on the tool name when no query token matches any document (e.g. searching `"hub"` where the token is `github`). - **Parallel execution unwraps the bridge.** The batch planner decides concurrency on the *underlying* tool of a `tool_call`, not on the literal bridge name — so an MCP server opted in via `supports_parallel_tool_calls: true` keeps its concurrency when its tools are called through the bridge, and `tool_search` / `tool_describe` lookups batch concurrently like any read-only tool. - **Catalog is stateless across turns.** It rebuilds from the current tool-defs list every assembly — no session-keyed `Map`. This avoids the class of bug where a stored catalog drifts out of sync with the live tool registry. - **The catalog is scoped to the session's toolsets.** `tool_search`, `tool_describe`, and `tool_call` only ever see and invoke tools the session was actually granted. A subagent, kanban worker, or gateway session restricted to a subset of toolsets cannot use the bridge to discover or call a tool outside that subset — the deferred catalog is the deferrable slice of the session's own enabled/disabled toolsets, not the whole process registry. - **No JS sandbox.** Hermes uses the simpler "structured tools" mode (search / describe / call as plain functions). The JS-sandbox "code mode" some other implementations offer is a large surface area; we skip it. ## See also - `tools/tool_search.py` — the implementation - `tests/tools/test_tool_search.py` — the regression suite - The `openclaw-tool-search-report` PDF in the original implementation PR for the research that shaped the design